GAIA Civil documentation
Use these guides to evaluate, configure, operate, integrate, and verify GAIA Civil. Sales pages explain the value; this documentation records the workflow, system behavior, review states, and implementation boundaries.
Reading order for an evaluation
Application engineers and estimators: Full project analysis, Quantity review, then Accuracy levels.
IT and security reviewers: Security and operations, then Integrations and extension.
See a sample report, or run the evidence test on ten of your projects with a Spec Check.
Choose the workflow that matches the decision
Opportunity screening and full project analysis are separate procedures. Screening ranks a larger candidate queue and explains why a project may deserve attention. Full analysis works through a selected project record in greater depth and prepares findings, quantities, questions, and a Qualified Opportunity Report.
A known priority project can begin with full analysis. Screening is not a required gate and a screening result is not a completed technical review.
- Use screening when the team needs to prioritize many candidate project sets.
- Use full analysis when a selected project already warrants detailed review.
- Use the evaluation guide before adoption to define sources, acceptance criteria, reviewers, and required outputs.
Documentation map
- Core workflows: project intake, screening, full analysis, finding review, quantities, and report handoff.
- Configuration: customer context, review rules, quantity accuracy levels, roles, and administration.
- Technical architecture: the GAIA Civil AI workflow layer, document processing, retrieval, recovery, and audit records.
- Integrations: the bidding-platform browser extension, current PDF handoffs, and implementation-specific connection boundaries.
- Security and operations: isolation, encryption, model-use boundaries, retention, recovery, and human release gates.
- Reference: the complete capability inventory and state dictionary.
Operating boundary
GAIA Civil prepares evidence-linked work for review. Final estimating, engineering, suitability, equivalency, compliance, pricing, customer communication, bid submission, and commercial approval remain with qualified people.
If a source cannot support an answer, the correct product state is UNKNOWN, needs input, or needs review - not an invented conclusion.