Screen first
Prioritize many candidate document sets, see why each may fit, and promote only the projects that warrant deeper work.
Screening procedureHow GAIA Civil works
GAIA Civil helps your team decide what deserves attention, understand the project record, verify the important evidence, and hand a better-prepared opportunity to the people who own the decision.
Start with the decision
The team does not need to force every opportunity through the same path.
Prioritize many candidate document sets, see why each may fit, and promote only the projects that warrant deeper work.
Screening procedureMove directly into a detailed, source-linked review when the project already has enough importance to justify it.
Full-analysis procedureFive practical steps
Each step separates what the application prepares from what your team remains responsible for.
Start with the products, applications, markets, exclusions, and commercial signals your team already uses to judge fit.
Associate plans, specifications, addenda, schedules, and available quantity sources with the same project. Upload them directly or use the browser extension to pull all tenant-relevant project documents from a supported bidding platform directly into screening or full ingestion.
Use screening to sort a large candidate set, or move a selected project directly into full review. Screening inside your workspace does not consume analysis credits; full analysis does, and you see the estimate before confirming.
Connect written requirements, drawing context, product information, quantity support, conflicts, and open questions.
Package the qualified record for the people responsible for estimating, technical response, sales follow-up, or a stop decision.
What the reviewer receives
The output is organized for the next person in the workflow: the commercial lead, estimator, technical reviewer, or executive sponsor.
Important findings remain connected to the document, page, sheet, section, detail, or region the source supports.
Quantity basis, formulas, assumptions, units, conflicts, and missing inputs stay visible to the reviewer.
Unsupported answers become a question, warning, or needs-input state instead of a confident guess.
Engineering suitability, approved equal decisions, final quantities, pricing, pursuit, customer communication, and bid submission remain human decisions. That boundary is part of the workflow - not fine print added at the end.
Common questions
For configuration, architecture, integration, and operating details, use the technical documentation.
No. Screening is useful when a team has more candidate projects than it can review deeply. A known priority project can begin with full analysis instead.
GAIA Civil keeps both sources visible, marks the conflict, and routes the question to the appropriate reviewer. It does not silently choose a technical interpretation.
No. It prepares the record and recommended next step. Qualified people retain responsibility for suitability, equivalency, quantities, pricing, pursuit, communication, and submission.
Bring a representative project set, the products or applications you care about, the way your team currently qualifies a project, and one or two examples of where manual review slows the next decision.
Walk through your real process
We'll map where GAIA Civil can remove preparation work, what the reviewer should receive, and where your existing approval boundaries stay in place.