Sample Qualified Opportunity Report

Five opportunities.
One traceable project record.

Anonymized sample · Municipal parking improvements

Follow each proposed geogrid application from its drawing and specification references through the quantity basis, commercial rationale, and engineering review.

Opportunities
5
Source references
151
Quantity confidence
75% Ballpark estimates
Engineering QA
REVIEW One item marked BLOCK

The opportunity record

From product fit to engineering review.

Installed quantities and pursuit confidence below are from the supplied report. Engineering QA states are carried forward from its detailed audit.

01

Biaxial Geogrid R4412

Permeable paver base stabilization

REVIEW

A specification match to the Tensar BX1200 baseline beneath the PaveDrain stone reservoir. The engineering audit retains submittal review and reconciles the two-roll order to 6,150 SF.

Installed, as reported
4,400 SF
Pursuit confidence
95%

Source references: [30][46][131][137]

02

Biaxial Geogrid S4415

Silva Cell perimeter wrapping

BLOCK

Perimeter containment for 126 frames across nine vaults, with approximately 350 cable ties. The audit blocks the proposed polypropylene alternate against the coated woven polyester specification pending resolution.

Installed, as reported
1,600 SF
Pursuit confidence
70%

Source references: [3][110][119][123][135]

03

Biaxial Geogrid R4413

Parking subgrade undercut value engineering

REVIEW

A subgrade stabilization proposal based on a 25% yielding-area scenario. The audit calls for proof-roll confirmation, geotechnical concurrence, and an explicit overlap allowance.

Installed, as reported
11,250 SF
Pursuit confidence
85%

Source references: [7][10][11][54][142]

04

Biaxial Geogrid S4430

Heavy-duty concrete apron stabilization

REVIEW

Base reinforcement beneath heavy-duty concrete pavement. The audit retains pavement-design review, overlap-factor reconciliation, and factory packaging confirmation.

Installed, as reported
4,500 SF
Pursuit confidence
80%

Source references: [7][78][112][146]

05

Biaxial Geogrid R4441

Temporary construction exit stabilization

REVIEW

A 50-by-20-foot pad plus a 200 SF flare, supplied from one 4,100 SF roll. The audit retains separation geotextile and full-footprint aggregate requirements.

Installed, as reported
1,200 SF
Pursuit confidence
85%

Source references: [43][70][118][150]

Quantity reconciliation

The review stays with the numbers.

The export includes the initial opportunity assessment and a later engineering audit. Their totals remain separately labeled, as reported.

Totals by report stage · square feet (SF)
Report stageInstalledOrder quantity
Executive summary22,750 SF28,656 SF
Engineering QA reconciliation22,950 SF28,650 SF

The earlier evidence ledger records CONDITIONAL PASS. The detailed engineering audit records REVIEW, with S4415 marked BLOCK. All quantities retain the report's BALLPARK / MODEL_ESTIMATED classification and 75% quantity confidence.

Read the engineering audit

Evidence you can follow

Open the source behind the finding.

The complete report includes the bill of materials, claim-to-source ledger, engineering calculations, reconciliation tables, raw data extracts, and 151 numbered source entries.

Each citation opens its source entry with the document filename and page number. The source PDFs themselves are not included in this sample.

Project, location, engineer, firm, bid date, and identifying plan filenames have been anonymized. Technical findings, quantities, review states, and citation numbering are retained.

Explore the source index

Every finding carries six things

  1. Source locator

    Document, revision, page, sheet, section, table, detail, or highlighted region.

  2. Finding

    The requirement, condition, commercial signal, or quantity supported by the source.

  3. Applied context

    Your approved product, application, engineering, estimating, and qualification rules.

  4. Calculation basis

    Scale, geometry, formula, inputs, units, allowances, cross-checks, and confidence.

  5. Uncertainty

    Conflicts, partial coverage, missing evidence, limitations, or an UNKNOWN value.

  6. Human action

    The responsible reviewer, open question, approval, and next commercial or technical step.

Your documents, your comparison

Want this on your own projects?

The Spec Check produces reports and verification packets on ten of your projects, with a scorecard and written recommendation.